.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;} <$BlogRSDURL$>

The Donnybrook
Friday, June 16, 2006
 
A Truly Offensive Form Of "Amnesty"...

Although it's not about allowing illegal immigrants to remain in the United States, so I doubt you'll hear too many Republicans complain about this one:

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki on Wednesday proposed a limited amnesty to help end the Sunni Arab insurgency as part of a national reconciliation plan that Maliki said would be released within days. The plan is likely to include pardons for those who had attacked only U.S. troops, a top adviser said....Reconciliation could include an amnesty for those "who weren't involved in the shedding of Iraqi blood," Maliki told reporters at a Baghdad news conference. "Also, it includes talks with the armed men who opposed the political process and now want to turn back to political activity."
2500 U.S. troops dead as of today.

Does it still seem worth it when Iraq's new PM is essentially giving attacks against the troops a tacet approval?

UPDATE: I'm bringing this back to the top because Senate Republicans have exceeded my expectations on this topic in the worst possible way by welcoming amnesty for insurgents who have attacked U.S. troops...

TED STEVENS - “IF THAT’S AMNESTY, I’M FOR IT:” “I really believe we ought to try to find some way to encourage that country to demonstrate to those people who have been opposed to what we're trying to do, that it's worthwhile for them and their children to come forward and support this democracy. And if that's amnesty, I'm for it. I'd be for it. And if those people who are, come forward… if they bore arms against our people, what's the difference between those people that bore arms against the Union in the War between the States? What’s the difference between the Germans and Japanese and all the people we’ve forgiven?” Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK)

MCCONNELL SUGGESTED A RESOLUTION COMMENDING IRAQIS FOR GIVING TERRORISTS AMNESTY. “…might it not just be as useful an exercise to be trying to pass a resolution commending the Iraqi government for the position that they’ve taken today with regard to this discussion of Amnesty?”–Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

ALEXANDER COMPARED IRAQI AMNESTY FOR TERRORISTS TO NELSON MANDELA’S PEACE EFFORTS. “Is it not true that Nelson Mandela's courage and his ability to create a process of reconciliation and forgiveness was a major factor in what has been a political miracle in Africa…Did not Nelson Mandela, win a - the co-winner of - a noble Nobel Peace Prize just for this sort of gesture?”–Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN)

CORNYN: IRAQI AMNESTY DEBATE IS “A DISTRACTION.” “It makes no sense for the United States Senate to shake its finger at the new government of Iraq and to criticize them… it really is a distraction from the debate that I think the American people would want us to have.” -Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)

CHAMBLISS: AMNESTY IS OK FOR EX-INSURGENTS AS LONG AS THEY ARE ON OUR SIDE NOW. “Is it not true today that we have Iraqis who are fighting the war against the insurgents, who at one time fought against American troops and other coalition troops as they were marching to Baghdad, who have now come over to our side and are doing one heck of a job of fighting along, side by side, with Americans and coalition forces, attacking and killing insurgents on a daily basis?”-Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)

This Republican majority has to go...

2nd UPDATE: Welcome Federal Review readers!

Feel free to speak up and tell me why you think a policy that places a lower value on the life of a US troop than that of an Iraqi troop is a good thing and a noble way to honor the service of said US troops.

And please forgive me for being "hate-addled" by disagreeing with you.

Again, welcome...



|

Powered by Blogger